Dubai courts ruled to divorce the wife for damage. And obligated him to pay her and her daughter's expenses

A husband justifies images and phrases of flirting with women with a "required courtesy"

The wife filed a lawsuit before the Personal Status Court in Dubai. From the source

An Asian woman filed a lawsuit before the Personal Status Court in Dubai, demanding that she be divorced from her husband because she was "most harmed" by him because of his repeated infidelity to her, and her access to photos and conversations containing clear flirtatious phrases with other women, a behavior that he justified by the "required courtesy" of his working conditions.

In her lawsuit, the wife also demanded that her husband be obliged to return their daughter from their country to reside with her mother in the UAE after he disavowed her expenses, in addition to the expenses prescribed by Sharia, including the maintenance of waiting period, pleasure and custody, while obliging him to pay the expenses of enrolling the child in school.

After hearing the case and hearing the parties and their defences, the Court of First Instance ruled that she had divorced her with a first shot that showed damage, stressing that she was not convinced of the justifications for the husband's infidelity to his wife, while obliging him to pay all the required expenses, except for the maintenance of pleasure, since she divorced of her own will and not by the will of her husband.

The woman's legal representative, arbitrator and legal adviser, Mohamed Naguib, said that the wife based her lawsuit on the fact that she had a child from him in her custody and care, and that she was severely affected by him, and tried to maintain the stability of the family more than once despite discovering his repeated betrayals to her, until he asked her to travel with his daughter to their country under the pretext of increasing the burdens of living, on a promise from him to return her to the UAE after his situation improved, but she discovered that he was clearing the way for himself to act according to his whims freely, away about her.

Najib added that the client returned again to the UAE, but the husband began to assault, insult and insult her, and forced her to return again to his country with their daughter, without providing her with housing there or sending them the required expenses, or paying his daughter's tuition fees, but the case reached the point of banning her numbers and her family numbers, so that no one would communicate with him, after he took gold jewelry from her given to her by her father at their wedding, for claiming that he is going through financial hardship and wants to help his brother Marrying.

During the deliberation of the lawsuit, the parties attended, and the court offered them reconciliation, but it was not accepted by them, and the husband decided that the plaintiff was in her country, and does not know how or when she returned to the UAE, considering that what is between them is just a misunderstanding, and expressing his desire to continue the marital relationship, and that he sends alimony to it, denying that he received a huge salary as she claims, and that his income is estimated at about 10,<> dirhams only, which can be increased if he receives commissions.

The defendant denied assaulting his wife, accusing her of tampering with his privacy, voyeurism on his personal phone without his knowledge, obtaining the pictures in it and transforming them into false facts to accuse him of treason, and supporting her request for divorce, noting that he appears in some pictures with a colleague in the car, in addition to that the conversations that his wife cites against him, are just flirtatious phrases that he exchanges with women as a courtesy, by virtue of the nature of his work, which imposes on him this, as a sales manager.

For its part, the court explained in the merits of its ruling, that the defendant is no longer a legitimate residence for the wife and this represents a kind of damage, pointing out that the wife's insistence on the continuation of the marital relationship, and to return to the UAE and request legal cohabitation with her husband, but he evaded his duties, seeking after his pleasures, according to the constant pictures and conversations with foreign women include phrases of spinning and love, without denying it, justifying his act with fellowship and courtesy, but he forgot that he is immune and must stay away from steps Harming his reputation and status, and he also harmed his wife in an obscene moral way that would scratch the marital relationship, by not denying her the large number of his female relations, and then the court ruled to divorce her with one shot that showed damage.

The court responded to the plaintiff's request for several alimony, without paying attention to his claim that his burden was burdened with obligations, and estimated her housing rent at 7000,1300 dirhams for the entire period of 'iddah, and obligated him to pay her spousal alimony of <>,<> dirhams per month.

Regarding the mother's request to prove and extend the age of custody of her child, the court responded and ruled to prove her custody of her daughter, and obligated him to pay her a nursery fee of 400 dirhams per month since the date of her exit from the kit, and also obligated him to support the little girl in the amount of 500 dirhams in her country, and 1100 dirhams when she lived in the UAE, but ruled to oblige him to return the child to be with her mother inside the country, and to provide them with a nursery home of 6000 dirhams if they are in their country, and 16 thousand dirhams inside the UAE, as well as paying housing services bills. It also obligated him to pay the child's tuition fees, bring her in and provide her with a health card, and hand over all her identity papers to her mother.