A young man buys a Snapchat account for 40 thousand dirhams and loses it after 3 days

Al Ain Court of First Instance rejected the claim of another young student to refund the amount of 40,000 dirhams he had paid for buying an account on the social networking site "Snapchat" and was surprised after 3 days to close the account.
In the details, a young man filed a lawsuit against another, in which he demanded that he be obliged to pay him an amount of 40 thousand dirhams and legal interest at the rate of 5% from the date of the judicial claim until full payment with obliging him to fees and expenses and for attorney fees, noting that the defendant sold the plaintiff an account on social networking sites Snapchat for 40 thousand dirhams and after two days the defendant closed the account and by referring to him to find out the reasons for the closure, he told him that he would open the account again He was later surprised that the defendant had sold the account to someone else, and submitted a copy of 3 bank deposit receipts for the claim amount.
While the defendant submitted a memorandum in which he denied the plaintiff's allegations, insisting that he handed over the account to him according to what the latter acknowledged in the lawsuit sheet, and that the plaintiff in turn sold the account after two months to another person for an amount of 50 thousand dirhams, and that the closure of the account was due to the misuse of the new buyer and his violation of the company's conditions, and at the end of his memorandum he requested the dismissal of the lawsuit and attached a copy of the WhatsApp conversation.
While the report of the engineering expert in the field of information technology delegated by the court showed that the plaintiff bought from the defendant a Snapchat communication account for an amount of 40 thousand dirhams, and the experience found that the account of the subject of the lawsuit does not exist on the social media platform Snapchat, so the experience could not preview the account or determine the date of its creation and track its status, and it was not technically able to know the reasons for the closure, indicating that the owner of the original account is a woman of Arab nationality and not the defendant and was The latter plays the role of an intermediary in selling the account for a commission, and the plaintiff used the account for a period of time approximately a month, then sold it to another person for 50 thousand dirhams, and after the other person used the account for three days, he could not access the account, and could not determine whether the account was closed or withdrawn from Snapchat management.
The report indicated that after examining the expertise of the plaintiff's mobile phone and examining the messages exchanged between the two parties regarding the terms of the contract and the commitment of each party via the social networking application WhatsApp, the defendant sent a message to the plaintiff explaining that he had communicated with the original owner of the account and explaining that the original owner told him that Snapchat was the one who withdrew the account and addressed the Snapchat management to solve the problem and there was no response, and the plaintiff responded on the same date by confirming to the defendant Referring to him that he promised him that he would compensate him for the account and the defendant did not deny it.
For its part, the court explained in the reasons for its judgment that the plaintiff stuck in his present lawsuit to close the account as a result of a problem in the account and its use, and the technical expert stated in his report that it was not possible to know the technical reasons that led to the closure of the account, but he indicated in his report that the plaintiff used the account for a period of time approximately a month and also disposed of it, which the court concludes from that the plaintiff received the account from the defendant free of defects and used it for a period of not simple and did not It is proved from the papers that the defendant had a role in closing the account, and then his claim to rescind the contract and recover the price is not valid, and this does not affect what the plaintiff adhered to from the defendant's pledge to compensate him with another account, as the phrases contained in the WhatsApp conversation came general in their significance without an explicit acknowledgment of the debt and did not cut off assertively to return the amount to the defendant, and then the lawsuit has lost its legal basis, and the court ruled to reject the lawsuit As set out by the reasons, the plaintiff is obligated to pay fees and expenses.