▲ The above picture is not directly related to the content of the article.

A man in his 40s has been sentenced to prison for forcibly molesting his biological daughter by touching her body parts everywhere.

The crime against humanity came to light when the victim's daughter confessed to her mother and counseling agency.

According to legal circles today (15th), the Criminal Division 13 of the Uijeongbu District Law recently sentenced Mr. A, a man in his 40s, to five years in prison after he was charged with violating the Special Law on Punishment of Crimes of Sexual Violence (quasi-forcible molestation due to kinship).

He was also ordered to complete 5 hours of a sexual violence treatment program and to be restricted from working in institutions related to children and adolescents and welfare facilities for the disabled for five years each.

Mr. A, the biological father of the victim, Miss B, is accused of touching the body of his biological daughter, Miss B, who was sleeping at her mother-in-law's house in northern Gyeonggi Province in 80, and the body of Miss B, who was also asleep in his office in the same year.

In 5, it was also investigated that he touched Miss B's body while she was lying in the master room of his house, showed her the contraceptive device he had prepared, told her to "make love him," and forcibly molested her.

Mr. A's molestation continued everywhere after that, even in a car parked on the road in December of the same year.

Mr. A's crime came to light when Miss B informed her mother and counseling agency about the damage.

"The defendant repeatedly committed crimes against humanity by using the victim as a tool to satisfy his perverted sexual desires," the court said, adding that "the guilt of each crime and the punishment commensurate with the court should be meted out."

However, among the charges filed by the prosecution, the prosecution acquitted Miss A of the charge that she committed the same crime against Miss B, who was an elementary school student at the time, in 2019 and 2020, saying, "Miss B is not enough to admit the fact of the partial indictment, such as reversing her statement in court, and there is no evidence to admit otherwise."